Engage Green

Month

March 2011

3 posts

Climate Change Emergency: Time to Slam on the Brakes
 


photo: John Norton/Creative Commons

The following is a guest post from Skeptical Science by James Wight

Global warming is an increasingly urgent problem. The urgency isn’t obvious because a large amount of warming is being delayed. But some of the latest research says if we want to keep the Earth’s climate within the range humans have experienced, we must leave nearly all the remaining fossil fuels in the ground. If we do not act now we could push the climate beyond tipping points, where the situation spirals out of our control. How do we know this? And what should we do about it? Read on.

James Hansen, NASA’s top climatologist and one of the first to warn greenhouse warming had been detected, set out to define dangerous human interference with climate. In 2008, his team came to the startling conclusion that the current level of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is already in the danger zone.

The Importance of 350ppm, Slow v. Fast Climate Feedbacks
Since the Industrial Revolution, atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 to 390 parts per million (ppm). Don’t be fooled by the small number - 390 ppm is higher than CO2 has been in millions of years. CO2 is rising by 2 ppm per year as we continue to burn fossil fuels. To stabilise the Earth’s climate, we must reduce CO2 to the relatively safe level of 350 ppm. And we must hurry, because the task will soon be an impossible one.

The 350 target is based not on climate modelling, but on past climate change (“paleoclimate”). Hansen looked at the highly accurate ice core record of the last few hundred thousand years, sediment core data going back 65 million years, and the changes currently unfolding. He discovered that, in the long term, climate is twice as sensitive in the real world as it is in the models used by the IPCC.

The key question in climate modelling is how much global warming you get from doubling CO2, once all climate feedbacks are taken into account. A feedback is something that amplifies or cancels out the initial effect (eg. interest is a feedback on a loan). The models include “fast feedbacks” like water vapour, clouds, and sea ice, but exclude longer-term “slow feedbacks” like melting ice sheets (an icy surface reflects more heat than a dark surface).

Both models and paleoclimate studies agree the warming after fast feedbacks is around 3°C per doubling of CO2. Slow feedbacks have received far less attention. Paleoclimate is the only available tool to estimate them. To cut a long story short, Hansen found the slow ice sheet feedback doubles the warming predicted by climate models (ie. 6°C per CO2 doubling).

The global climate has warmed only 0.7°C, but has not yet fully responded to our past emissions. We know this because the Earth is still gaining more heat than it is losing. There is further warming in the pipeline, and Hansen’s results imply there’s a lot more than in the models. If CO2 remains at 390 ppm long enough for the ice sheet feedback to kick in, the delayed warming would eventually reach 2°C. That would result in an Earth unlike the one on which humans evolved and a sea level rise of not one metre, not two metres, but 25 metres. Imagine waves crashing over an eight-storey building.

It’s hard to dispute this would be “dangerous” climate change. But how quickly could it happen? In the past, ice sheets took millennia to respond, though once they got moving sea level rose several metres per century. But maybe ice sheets can melt faster if CO2 rises faster, as it is now doing. The IPCC predicted they would grow by 2100, but instead they are starting to shrink “100 years ahead of schedule”. Once an ice sheet begins to collapse there is no way to stop it sliding into the ocean. We would suffer centuries of encroaching shorelines. The climate change we started would proceed out of our control.

If ice sheets can melt significantly this century, then Hansen’s long-term warming has near-term policy implications. The tragedy we have set in motion can still be prevented, if we get the Earth to stop accumulating heat before slow feedbacks can kick in. To do so we must target the greatest, fastest-growing, and longest-lived climate driver: CO2.

Under business as usual, we are heading for up to 1000ppm by 2100, or nearly two doublings (and that’s not including possible carbon feedbacks). This would surely be an unimaginable catastrophe on any timescale. Even the mitigation scenarios governments are quarreling over are based on IPCC assessments now several years out of date. The lowest CO2 target being considered is 450 ppm, which Hansen concluded would eventually melt all ice on the planet, raising sea level by 75 metres. The Earth has not been ice-free since around the time our distant ancestors split off from monkeys.

Instead of stepping on or easing off the accelerator, we need to be slamming on the brakes. We must not only slow the rise of CO2 in the atmosphere, but reverse it. We must reduce CO2 from 390 to 350 ppm as soon as possible.That should stop the planet’s accumulation of heat. Stabilising the CO2 level will require rapidly reducing CO2 emissions until nature can absorb carbon faster than we emit it - in practical terms, cutting emissions to near zero.

The only realistic way of getting back to 350 ppm is leaving most of the remaining fossil fuels in the ground. We must:

  1. phase out coal by 2030. It is not enough to slow down coal-burning by converting it to liquid fuels, because CO2 stays in the atmosphere for a very long time. The fundamental problem is with the coal being burned at all.
  2. not burn tar sands or oil shale. Their reserves are virtually untapped but thought to contain even more carbon than coal. Canada cannot keep burning them.
  3. not burn the last drops of oil and gas if their reserves are on the high side. If it turns out we have already used about half, then we can safely burn the rest.
  4. turn deforestation into reforestation. We’d still be left with the gargantuan task of removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Nature can absorb some carbon, but it has limits.

It won’t be easy, but with these actions CO2 could peak around 400 ppm as early as 2025 and return to 350 ppm by century’s end. I believe we can achieve this; it’s primarily a question of political will. But our window of opportunity is rapidly slamming shut. Even one more decade of business as usual, and CO2 can be expected to remain in the danger zone for a very long time.

I should point out estimating a CO2 target from paleoclimate is fraught with uncertainties. I’ve had to simplify for this short article. I explain in more detail on Skeptical Science, or you can read Hansen’s paper free here. If there is one lesson recent climate research should teach us, it is that it’s a mistake to call uncertainty our friend. Arguably the most important aspect Hansen ignores, carbon feedbacks, is likely to make things even worse. There is more than enough reason to heed Hansen’s warning.

Right now we stand at an intersection. What we do in this decade is crucial. If we choose one path, by the end of the decade the world could be well on its way to phasing out coal. If we choose the other, we face an uncertain future in which the only certainty is a continually shifting climate. I’ll leave the final word to Hansen et al, whose concluding statements were pretty strongly worded coming from a dense, technical, peer-reviewed paper:

Present policies, with continued construction of coal-fired power plants without CO2 capture, suggest that decision-makers do not appreciate the gravity of the situation. We must begin to move now toward the era beyond fossil fuels. […] The most difficult task, phase-out over the next 20-25 years of coal use that does not capture CO2, is Herculean, yet feasible when compared with the efforts that went into World War II. The stakes, for all life on the planet, surpass those of any previous crisis. The greatest danger is continued ignorance and denial, which could make tragic consequences unavoidable.

More on Global Climate Change:
Americans Believe in Climate Change More Than Global Warming
Melting Polar Ice Sheets Overtake Glaciers As Main Cause of Sea Level Rise - One Foot By 2050 Possible

Mar 11, 20111 note
To Know about those curly compact fluorescent light bulbs


The solution that saves energy and reduces greenhouse gas emissions – those curly compact fluorescent light bulbs {CFLs} are replacing Edison’s original round bulbs and are seen everywhere, from local grocery stores to our homes. But what you may not know is that sealed inside each little bulb, a hidden danger is lurking, one that involves special handling and disposal and can possibly harm you and your family.
 

Everyone’s heard of Mercury, not the planet… the metallic element. Hg on the Periodic table, Mercury is a highly toxic, developmental neurotoxin that can damage the brain, liver, kidneys and central nervous system. In 2007, Mercury ranked number three on the list of hazardous substances as outlined by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry {ATSDR} and the Environmental Protection Agency {EPA}. Every form of it is toxic and yet mercury is an essential element in millions of fluorescent lamps throughout the world. The Mercury from just one fluorescent bulb can pollute 6,000 gallons of water beyond safe levels for drinking!

   

Sure, these light bulbs are advertised as “safe” and don’t pose any health risks to you as long as the glass remains intact. See, the danger in these bulbs comes if the bulb cracks, breaks or is not disposed of properly. Of course these bulbs are going to break… they’re made of glass! And not to mention the health effects these bulbs pose on our environment if, for heaven’s sake, one of these glass bulbs were to crack. The EPA reports, “187 incinerators nationwide emit approximately 70,000 pounds of mercury into the environment each year.” From the air to waterways, lakes to oceans – mercury is found everywhere in our environment. Just one teaspoon of mercury can contaminate a 20-acre lake forever and it’s estimated that each year 600 million fluorescent lamps are disposed of in US landfills amounting to 30,000 pounds of mercury waste.

With new inventions constantly popping up, the past is left behind us. Now, when your CFL light bulb accidentally breaks, mercury vapors are released into your home or office; it’s no longer as easy as changing a light bulb. YOU need to know what to do to minimize you and your family’s exposure to mercury vapor.

According to the EPA:

:: People and pets should immediately leave the room
:: Open a window and/or door and air out the room for 5 to 10 minutes
:: Turn off the central forced air heating/air-conditioning system
:: Thoroughly collect broken glass and visible powder using wet cloths. Never use vacuum cleaners or brooms
:: Put all debris and cleanup materials in a sealable container and put outdoors in a trash container or protected area until materials can be disposed of properly. Do not leave bulb fragments or cleanup materials indoors.

Mar 11, 20111 note
5 simple things to help reduce your environmental impact

Everyday we walk the planet, damaging our environment as we go along our daily routines. From plastic bags to household cleaners our actions are killing our ecosystem. But we can help! Read on to learn 5 simple things YOU can do today to help reduce your environmental impact, save money, and live a happier and healthier life.

1. Paper Or Plastic? – Choosing Plastic

Whether we’re packing a sandwich for lunch or buying ingredients for dinner at the grocery store, plastic bags are everywhere. According to Clean Up Australia, “Australians use in excess of 6 billion plastic bags per year. If tied together these bags would form a chain that is long enough to go around the world 37 times.” 37 times! And that’s only one continent; imagine if we calculated all 7 continents… our earth would turn into one huge plastic mummy. And that would be year round, not just on Halloween.

Reconsider your use of plastic products. Recycle and reuse all materials properly and whenever possible. Next time you pack a lunch, reconsider the packaging used. Instead of plastic baggies, switch to reusable cloth bags easily kept clean by tossing into your dishwasher. When that age-old question of “paper or plastic?” comes up at your local grocery store proudly state, “neither, I brought my reusable bag.”

2. On The Go – Using Plastic Bottles

That plastic bottle housing your drinking water may be convenient, but the reality is it’s killing our environment. According to a 2001 report of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), “roughly 1.5 million tons of plastic are expended in the bottling of 89 billion liters of water each year. That plastic requires up to 47 million gallons of oil per year to produce. After all of this, 90% of bottles land in the garbage or our waterways instead of the recycle bin.”

Those 47 million gallons of oil could fuel 100,000 cars for a year, but instead it’s wasted on the making of plastic bottles. Imagine your water bottle filled a quarter of the way up with oil. That’s about the amount it takes to produce that one bottle. Not a pretty sight huh?

Did you know: Americans use four million plastic bottles every hour, yet only one out of four are recycled! Instead of these bottles ending up in landfills, plastic bottles could be recycled and made into items like carpet, t-shirts, sweaters or toys, among other things.

3. Can It – Trashing Recycled Goods

One of the biggest challenges with our population is convincing people to hold onto their plastic and aluminum containers, bottles and cans until they get home so they can be properly recycled. It’s a small step that can have a BIG outcome.

For every six water bottles used, only one is making it into the recycling bin. Those remaining five bottles are now housed in landfills, floating in our rivers, lakes and oceans and taking more than 700 years to biodegrade. They are endangering aquatic life and our health by leaking PET into the waters and ground, contaminating everything in its sight.

On the bright side, that one plastic bottle that was recycled can now save enough energy to power a 60-watt light bulb for six hours! Use your power – recycle and do your part in saving our endangered planet.

Recycling is one of the best and easiest ways to reduce your carbon footprint and help save the environment. Recycling saves energy, which saves the planet, which saves us. Did you know it takes 95% less energy to recycle an aluminum can then it does to make a new can? And to think that all you have to do is throw that one can into a separate bin and it makes that much of a difference.


4. Drip Drip – Leaving The Faucet Running

We all do it occasionally or even multiple times a day. Leaving the faucet running while we wash our dishes, brush our teeth and shave for just two minutes is equal to 3-5 gallons of water. Turning the faucet on only when necessary can save thousands of gallons of water a year, not to mention the energy and money to heat it. According to water.org, “The average American individual uses 100 to 176 gallons of water at home each day. The average African family uses about 5 gallons of water each day”

5. Clean-Up – Cleaning With Universal Household Cleaners

We use them, buy them and store them in our houses; they make our kitchen’s sparkle and bathrooms sanitary, but many household cleaning products are far from safe – they’re bad for our health, the air we breathe and the oceans we swim in. Most universal cleaning products contain harmful chemicals that have serious adverse effects on humans, our households and the environment.

Everyday, bleaches, detergents and all-purpose cleaners are poured down drains, circulated through ventilation systems and disposed of improperly. Chemicals in these cleaners have tremendous environmental consequences including air and water pollution, ozone depletion, bioaccumulation of toxic substances in plants and animals and endocrine disruption in wildlife, affecting animal’s reproductive ability.

So what can you do? When buying any product, it’s important to read the product labels carefully. Many products will sport a label stating they are “organic,” “biodegradable” and “environmentally friendly” when in fact this may not be true. Pick cleaners that are certified organic by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), meaning the products are radiation and pesticide free and made with sustainable farming practices.

Now it’s time to take action and make some green footprints…

  • Reconsider your use of plastic bags and make the switch to reusable cloth shopping and sandwich bags.
  • Eliminate bottled water from your diet by switching to drinking filtered tap water and using stainless steel or glass water bottles.
  • Discard your plastic goods properly in recycling bins around town or at home.
  • Only turn the faucet on when needed instead of leaving the water running while washing dishes or brushing teeth.
  • Invest in toxic-free household cleaning products that aren’t made up of harsh, harmful chemicals.

Mar 11, 2011
Next page →
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July 1
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2010 2011 2012
  • January 2
  • February
  • March 3
  • April
  • May 1
  • June
  • July 3
  • August 1
  • September 1
  • October
  • November 9
  • December 2
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September 5
  • October
  • November
  • December 3